Reviewing Process of the Journal of New Theory
Corresponding Author should send PDF file of the manuscripts with the
directly to Editor-in-Chief by e-mail: email@example.com
Editor-in-Chief may make a quick assessment on suitability and viability of the paper for
Journal of New Theory. Papers can be rejected or returned for revision to the authors at this
stage without full formal review. For formal reviewing, the Editor-in-Chief forwards the paper
to an Area Editor.
Area Editor forwards the paper to referees for formal reviewing. Correspondence with the
authors regarding revisions is typically done by the Editor.
Reviewers look for: clarity of expression and readability, implications and applications
and conformance to editorial objectives. All papers are expected to meet standards of
academic excellence. The reviewers send their decision by e-mail to the Area Editor with the
Manuscript Review Form.
Area Editor, based on the reviewers’ recommendations, decides whether the manuscript
should be accepted as it is, revised or rejected. The Editor reserves the right to reject a paper at
this stage or to ask for substantial revision. After finishing the reviewing process, the Editor
sends the final decision the Editor-in-Chief with the
Area Editor Decision Form.
Editor-in-Chief, according to the Area Editor’s decision, decides accept or reject the
paper. The authors will timely receive written notification of acceptance, remarks, comments
and evaluation of their articles via email, using the declared address. The Editor-in-Chief is
copied on all correspondence.
Corresponding Author should prepare final versions of accepted manuscripts according
to the Manuscript
Preparation Rules. Preparation may be very easy by using
Article Template (Microsoft Word.DOC) or
Article Template (LaTeX).
Corresponding Author should fill and sign the
Copyright Transfer Form and send both Copyright Transfer Form and LaTeX (tex) or MS Word
(doc/docx) file of final version of their paper directly to the Editors-in-Chief by e-mail: