Math proofs are deductive, as they start with a set of axioms and laws and use logical reasoning to derive new conclusions from them.

## Further information is provided below

Math proofs are a fundamental part of mathematics, serving as an essential tool for advancing our understanding of mathematical concepts. They are also a subject of great philosophical interest, as they represent one of the most rigorous forms of logical argumentation.

Math proofs are deductive, as they start with a set of axioms and laws and use logical reasoning to derive new conclusions from them. Deductive reasoning is a powerful tool for advancing our understanding of the world around us, and has been used to great effect in fields as diverse as science, philosophy, and law.

As noted by renowned mathematician Bertrand Russell, “Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty, a beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture, without appeal to any part of our weaker nature, without the gorgeous trappings of painting or music, yet sublimely pure, and capable of a stern perfection such as only the greatest art can show.”

Some interesting facts about math proofs include:

- The concept of mathematical proof has been in use for thousands of years, with early examples dating back to ancient Babylon and Egypt.
- Euclid’s Elements, written in the 4th century BCE, remains one of the most influential books on mathematics in history, and is still used as a textbook in many universities today.
- Prior to the advent of computers, math proofs were often handwritten and involved intricate diagrams and calculations.
- The world’s longest math proof is the classification of finite simple groups, which took several decades and involved the work of hundreds of mathematicians.

In conclusion, math proofs are a fascinating subject that combines deep philosophical questions with rigorous logical argumentation. Their importance cannot be overstated, as they form the foundation for much of modern mathematics and have played a crucial role in many other fields as well.

## Video response to your question

The video provides an introduction to inductive and deductive reasoning. The concept of inductive reasoning is explained using a basket of mangoes as an example, where a general conclusion is drawn based on specific observations. However, the video notes that although a conclusion may be logically true, it may not necessarily be realistically true. To illustrate this point, a second example about a box containing fruits is given, where the conclusion drawn from two true statements is wrong. It is also noted that inductive reasoning is frequently used in mathematics to arrive at conjectures that need to be proved with specific cases, using the principle of mathematical induction.

## Additional responses to your query

Mathematics is deductive. To be more precise, only deductive proofs are accepted in mathematics. Your "inductive proof" of the distributive property wouldn’t be accepted as a proof at all, merely as verification for a finite number of cases (1 case in your question).

Mathematical proofs are

deductive arguments. Deductive reasoning is a process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. In contrast, inductive reasoning is a process of reasoning from specific observations to reach a general conclusion. Proofs are examples of exhaustive deductive reasoning which establish logical certainty.

A mathematics proof is a deductive argument. Although induction and deduction are processes that proceed in mutually opposite directions, they are closely related. One could say, induction is the mother of deduction.

Proofs are examples of exhaustive deductive reasoning which establish logical certainty, to be distinguished from empirical arguments or non-exhaustive inductive reasoning which establish "reasonable expectation".

## In addition, people are interested

**Are proofs deductive or inductive?**

Response: deductive reasoning

Proofs are examples of exhaustive deductive reasoning which establish logical certainty, to be distinguished from empirical arguments or non-exhaustive inductive reasoning which establish "reasonable expectation".

People also ask, **Are mathematical proofs deductive?**

The response is: A deductive argument is characterized by the claim that its conclusion follows with strict necessity from the premises. A mathematics proof is a deductive argument. Although induction and deduction are processes that proceed in mutually opposite directions, they are closely related.

Furthermore, **Is math based on inductive or deductive reasoning?** Response to this: Mathematics is based on deductive reasoning: a proof is a logical deduction from a set of clear inputs. Science is based on inductive reasoning: hypotheses are strengthened or rejected based on an accumulation of experimental evidence.

Likewise, **What is the difference between inductive and deductive proof in math?****Inductive reasoning is coming to a conclusion after specific observations while deductive reasoning uses previously known facts and theories to come to a specific conclusion**. Usually, inductive reasoning is used to come up with a hypothesis, and deductive reasoning is used to prove these axioms and theorems.

Secondly, **What is the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning?** Answer will be: Deductive reasoning. A conjecture is something you would form using inductive reasoning. Also, if you prove a conjecture using deductive reasoning, then it becomes a theorem. Okay so Deductive reasoning starts with a fact, while Inductive reasoning is basically using patterns to make a probable solution. am I right?

Likewise, **Is proof by induction deductive?**

"Proof by induction," despite the name, is deductive. The reason is that proof by induction does not simply involve "going from many specific cases to the general case." Instead, in order for proof by induction to work, we need a deductive proof that each specific case implies the next specific case.

Also, **What is the difference between deduction and mathematical induction?**

Deduction is drawing a conclusion from something known or assumed. This is the type of reasoning we use in almost every step in a mathematical argument. Mathematical induction is a particular type of mathematical argument. It is most often used to prove general statements about the positive integers.

Likewise, **Are both theorems and postulates deductive or inductive?** Direct link to Matthew Daly’s post “No. Both theorems and po…” No. Both theorems and postulates are elements of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is noticing a pattern and making an educated guess based on that pattern. Here’s the test. Do we know for certain that the population of the town will be higher in 2020 than it was in 2010?