No, mathematical realism cannot be true without proofs as the philosophy asserts that mathematical objects exist independently of human thought and language, and proofs are required to support this claim.
Now let’s take a closer look at the question
Mathematical realism is a philosophical belief that mathematical entities exist independently of human thought and language, and that they can be studied and understood through human investigation. Proofs play a crucial role in supporting the idea of mathematical realism. As stated by James Robert Brown, a philosopher of mathematics, “Realism about math requires the existence of rigorous proof procedures, for only these can provide independent verification of the objects under investigation.”
Proofs are essential for validating mathematical claims and ensuring the accuracy of mathematical knowledge. Without proofs, the existence of mathematical objects cannot be verified, and mathematical realism would be difficult to defend. Mathematical proofs are a means of providing evidence for the existence of mathematical entities, and they support the idea that mathematics is a valid and objective field of study.
Interesting facts about mathematical realism include:
- Famous proponents of mathematical realism include Plato, Kurt Gödel, and Paul Benacerraf.
- Mathematical realism is often contrasted with mathematical nominalism, which argues that mathematical entities are merely linguistic constructions or mental constructs.
- The discovery of non-Euclidean geometries in the 19th century challenged the belief in a single, objective reality of mathematical entities.
- The concept of a proof evolved over time and has been formulated in various ways, including the Euclidean axiomatic method and the modern theory of proofs in mathematical logic.
In summary, mathematical realism cannot be true without proofs, as these are essential for verifying the existence of mathematical entities. Proofs provide a means of validating mathematical claims and supporting the idea that mathematics is an objective field of study. As stated by Bertrand Russell, “In mathematics, if you don’t know a thing, you don’t know it. If you don’t know it, but know that you don’t know it, then you’re on your way to knowing it.”
Here is a possible visual representation of the relationship between mathematical realism and proofs:
| Mathematical realism | |
|---|---|
| Claims that mathematical entities exist independently of human thought and language | |
| Requires proofs for verification of the existence of these entities | |
| Depends on the validity of proofs for the defense of its philosophical position |
Video response
This video discusses the debate between those who believe that mathematics is discovered, and those who believe that it is invented. The video provides examples of how mathematics has been used to solve problems in the real world.
Here are some more answers to your question
Not possible
It is not possible for any form of realism to be true without proofs.
It is not possible for any form of realism to be true without proofs.
It is not possible for any form of realism to be true without proofs.
Just to add the very trivial point that at the very least the Intuitionist Mathematician must also accept Definition in their sources of legitimate truths. These are taken to be in some sense “analytic” truths, declaring them not so much to be matters of substance than semantics, but our choices of definiens greatly influences the resulting mathematical structures that emerge from our proof processes!
Surely you will be interested in this
What is true without proof in math?
Statements which are assumed to be true without mathematical proof are said to be axioms.
What is accepted as true without proof?
As a response to this: Axiom. A statement about real numbers that is accepted as true without proof.
How important is mathematical proofs?
According to Bleiler-Baxter & Pair [22], for a mathematician, a proof serves to convince or justify that a certain statement is true. But it also helps to increase the understanding of the result and the related concepts. That is why a proof also has the role of explanation.
What is the argument for mathematical realism?
The answer is: Arguments for mathematical realism: Mathematical statements are objectively true or false. Realists argue this objective truth is best explained by the existence of mathematical facts independent of humans.
What is the realist view of mathematics?
As the realist sees it, mathematics is the study of a body of necessary and unchanging facts, which it is the mathematician’s task to discover, not to create. These form the subject matter of mathematical discourse: a mathematical statement is true just in case it accurately describes the mathematical facts.
What is truth value realism?
Answer: Truth-value realism is the view that every well-formed mathematical statement has a unique and objective truth-value that is independent of whether it can be known by us and whether it follows logically from our current mathematical theories. The view also holds that most mathematical statements that are deemed to be true are in fact true.
Is realism inexplicable?
Answer will be: The antirealist argues that the kinds of objective facts posited by the realist would be inaccessible to us, and would bear no clear relation to the procedures we have for determining the truth of mathematical statements. If this is right, then realism implies that mathematical knowledge is inexplicable.
What are the truths of mathematics?
Answer will be: Mathematicians claim that the truths of mathematics are incomprehensible, and they are independent of human activities. In fact, they are facts, and mathematics is based on them. To be truly meaningful, mathematicians must discover these facts. In other words, a mathematical statement is true if it describes these mathematical facts.
What is the realist view of mathematics?
Response will be: As the realist sees it, mathematics is the study of a body of necessary and unchanging facts, which it is the mathematician’s task to discover, not to create. These form the subject matter of mathematical discourse: a mathematical statement is true just in case it accurately describes the mathematical facts.
What is truth value realism?
Truth-value realism is the view that every well-formed mathematical statement has a unique and objective truth-value that is independent of whether it can be known by us and whether it follows logically from our current mathematical theories. The view also holds that most mathematical statements that are deemed to be true are in fact true.
Is realism inexplicable?
The antirealist argues that the kinds of objective facts posited by the realist would be inaccessible to us, and would bear no clear relation to the procedures we have for determining the truth of mathematical statements. If this is right, then realism implies that mathematical knowledge is inexplicable.
Is it true if there is no proof of a mathematical statement?
Response: See Platonism. According to a different point of view (see Intuitionism) it makes no sense to assert that a mathematical statement is true if we have no proof of it. Please note that propositions like "if P then Q" are not true or false, but valid or invalid.