Graham’s number is bigger than googolplexianth.

## And now, more specifically

According to mathematical calculations, Graham’s number is significantly bigger than googolplexianth. In fact, Graham’s number is so large that it is practically incomprehensible.

To give some perspective, here is an explanation by mathematician Ron Graham: “Imagine a stack of paper large enough to reach from the Earth to the sun, 93 million miles away. Now imagine doing the same thing with stacks of paper from that distance back to the Earth, repeated 100 times. Graham’s number is larger than the number of paper stacks you would need to do this.”

Graham’s number was first introduced in the late 1970s by mathematician Ronald Graham in a paper about bounds for a finite form of a problem in Ramsey theory. It was essentially an upper bound for the answer to a specific problem and was not originally meant to become such an iconic number.

Graham’s number is so large that it cannot be written out in full notation, and even attempting to do so would not fit within the observable universe. To understand its magnitude, a special notation known as Knuth’s up-arrow notation is used.

On the other hand, googolplexianth is the largest named number with a specific name. It is 10 to the power of a googolplex, which is a 1 followed by a googol zeros. However, Graham’s number dwarfs this number so significantly that it is not even a competition.

To further compare the two numbers, here is a table showcasing how Graham’s number compares to googolplexianth and other large numbers:

Name | Value in digits |
---|---|

Graham’s number | Much bigger than 10 to the power of 10 to the power of 10 to the power of 10 to the power of 10 |

Googolplexianth | 1 followed by a googolplex zeros |

Googol | 1 followed by 100 zeros |

Octodecillion | 39 zeros |

Quintillion | 18 zeros |

Trillion | 12 zeros |

In conclusion, while googolplexianth is an incredibly large number, it pales in comparison to the enormity of Graham’s number. As physicist Michio Kaku said, “Graham’s number boggles the mind…It’s an astronomical number that has no practical value.”

## Video response

Certainly! In this YouTube video titled “The Biggest Numbers in the World Size Comparison,” the speaker showcases a size comparison of various numbers, starting from the smallest unit of measurement (Planck length) and gradually moving to some of the largest numbers in the universe. The video uses a visual representation where each number is represented by a cube, with the size of the cube increasing as the number gets larger. Some of the numbers featured in the video include millions, billions, trillions, quadrillions, quintillions, and even numbers like googol and googolplex. The video also highlights various real-life applications and comparisons to help understand the scale of these numbers.

## Here are some other answers to your question

(This might sound familiar, as Google was named after this number, though they got the spelling wrong.)

Graham’s number is also bigger than a googolplex, which Milton initially defined as a 1, followed by writing zeroes until you get tired, but is now commonly accepted to be 10googol=10(10100).

Graham’s number is much bigger than the googolplex. A googolplex is the number 1 followed by a googol of zeroes, which is a 1 followed by 100 zeros. It is written mathematically as a 1 with a googol zeroes after it: 10^ (10^100). In comparison, Graham’s number is so large that it is almost impossible to comprehend. It is not clear how Graham’s number is defined, but it is known to be much larger than a googolplex.

Graham’s number is much bigger than the googolplex. A googolplex is the number 1 followed by a googol of zeroes, which is a 1 followed by 100 zeros. It is written mathematically as a 1 with a googol zeroes after it: 10^ (10^100). In comparison, Graham’s number is so large that it is almost impossible to comprehend.

A Googol is defined as 10 100. A Googolplex is defined as 10 Googol. A Googolplexian is defined as 10 Googolplex. Intuitively, it seems to me that Graham’s number is larger (maybe because of it’s complex definition).

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Not even close. Not even remotely close. Not even funny, how not even close these two numbers are. They aren’t in the same ballpark, the same world, the same universe, the same multi-universe.

Googolplexian is “ten to the power googolplex”, while googolplex is “ten to the power googol”, and googol is “ten to the power one hundred”. In other words, googol is 1 followed by a hundred zeroes, googolplex is 1 followed by a googol zeroes, and googolplexian is 1 followed by a googolplex of zeroes.

Large?

That’s nothing. Less than microscopic. Negligible. Peanuts, smashed to bits with a sledgehammer and then crushed in a particle accelerator. A single quark, compared with a googolplexian universes, is still far from representing just how tiny googolplexian is compared to Graham’s number.

Seriously, I’m not exaggerating.

Look:

[math]\displaystyle \text{googol} = 10^{100} %3C \left(3^3

ight)^{100} = 3^{300} %3C 3^{3^{3^3}} = 3\uparrow\!\uparrow 4[/math]The mighty goo…

## Surely you will be interested in this

Simply so, **What is greater than Graham’s number?** Response: Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham’s number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman’s various finite forms of Kruskal’s theorem.

Similar

**How many zeros are there in Graham’s number?** Response: 100 zeros

It is a one followed by 100 zeros. (Fun fact: this number inspired the name of the search engine Google, but the company’s founders accidentally misspelled it when checking whether the web domain was still available. The rest is history.)

Also to know is, **Is Googolplexian the biggest number?**

The reply will be: A "googol" is the number 1 followed by 100 zeroes. The biggest number with a name is a "googolplex," which is the number 1 followed by a googol zeroes.

**What is bigger googolplex or Googolplexian?**

The answer is: A Googol is defined as 10100. A Googolplex is defined as 10Googol. *A Googolplexian is defined as 10Googolplex*.

Also question is, **Is Graham’s number bigger than a googolplex?**

Response will be: See YouTube or wikipedia for the defination of Graham’s number. A Googol is defined as 10 100. A Googolplex is defined as 10 Googol. A Googolplexian is defined as 10 Googolplex. Intuitively, it seems to me that *Graham’s number is larger* (maybe because of it’s complex definition).

**Is googolplexian the biggest number?***Googolplexian is one followed by one googolplex zeroes*, and many articles state it is the biggest named number. But they obviously don’t do their research, Googolplexian hardly covers the first floor of Graham’s number…

**How big is Graham’s number?**

The response is: Graham’s number is SOOOOO much bigger than a googolplex. MOST people couldn’t even BEGIN to understand the size of Graham’s number. Something like: If every subatomic particle in our universe was another universe, and you could write 1 GOOGOL digits on each subatomic particle, you would barely have started to write down Grahams number!

Regarding this, **How powerful is Graham’s number-ex-Grand godgahlah?**

Response: That is the saladgahlah!" Of course, Graham’s Number-ex-grand godgahlah is WAY more powerful than everything else, and Cookie Fonster knows this. We can basically ignore everything else in the number. So this would be literally just like saying Graham’s Number-ex-grand godgahlah. As stated by Cookie Fonster himself, these numbers are sloppy.

Beside this, **Is Graham’s number bigger than a googolplex?**

The answer is: See YouTube or wikipedia for the defination of Graham’s number. A Googol is defined as 10 100. A Googolplex is defined as 10 Googol. A Googolplexian is defined as 10 Googolplex. Intuitively, it seems to me that Graham’s number is larger (maybe because of it’s complex definition).

Beside this, **Is the googolplexian a huge number?**

Answer will be: Ah, this fascinating dance with large numbers. The Googolplexian is a staggeringly huge number. It is however staggeringly small when you consider Graham’s number, or similar such numbers that are defined on the basis of exponential powers.

Thereof, **How big is Graham’s number?**

Response to this: Graham’s number is bigger the number of atoms in the observable Universe, which is thought to be *between 10 78 and 10 82*. It’s bigger than the 48th Mersenne prime , the biggest prime number we know, which has an impressive 17,425,170 digits.

One may also ask, **How do you write a googolplexianth?** Your Googleplexianth is pretty big. We could write: Googolplexianth = [math]10^ {10^ {10^ {1 [/math] Graham’s Number is bigger, in fact its so big that you cold repeat the process of raising 10 to the previous number for as long as you like, and not get close. What would win, a googolplex of US Marines or a Graham’s number of ants?